Supplement businesses face stricter reviews than typical online stores. Because supplements relate to health and customer expectations, banks and PSPs see them as higher risk. Refunds, chargebacks, and compliance issues are more common in this space, so payment providers look deeper before approving an account.
Instead of checking only basic company details, they apply a risk-based review process. This means examining products, marketing claims, refund policies, and overall business stability.
This guide explains how underwriting decisions are made, what banks focus on most, and how supplement merchants can prepare for a smoother, more secure approval process.
How Supplement Merchant Underwriting Works in Modern Payment Systems
Underwriting is the process banks and payment service providers use to decide whether a business can safely process card payments. In simple terms, it’s a structured risk review. Before approving a merchant account, providers examine how a company operates, what it sells, and how likely it is to generate disputes or financial losses.
To reach that decision, banks apply internal risk models. These models assess projected chargebacks, average order value, subscription structures, sales regions, and overall business stability. Website content, refund policies, and marketing language are also reviewed to measure transparency and compliance.
Because supplements are ingestible and tied to health expectations, the review process becomes more detailed. This is where supplement merchant underwriting differs from standard retail approvals, requiring deeper scrutiny, stronger documentation, and clearer risk controls.
Why Supplements Are Classified as High-Risk
Supplement businesses are often labeled high-risk because they operate in a space where payments, health perception, and customer trust overlap. This is especially true in areas like nutraceutical payment processing, where banks see a higher chance of disputes compared to standard retail.
One major factor is chargeback exposure. Customers may dispute transactions if results don’t meet expectations or if they misunderstand product use. Regulatory sensitivity adds another layer of risk. Health-related claims must be carefully worded, and even small compliance mistakes can trigger issues with regulators or card networks.
There’s also a gap between customer expectations and real-world product results. Supplements don’t work the same for everyone, which can lead to dissatisfaction. On top of that, industry-wide dispute ratios are higher than average, making banks cautious. Cross-border sales further increase complexity due to varying regulations, labeling rules, and consumer protection laws across countries.
Business Structure & Ownership Transparency
Banks and PSPs closely examine a supplement business’s legal structure, especially when handling secure international payments. A clear, well-documented setup signals stability and reduces uncertainty. Underwriting starts with a legal entity review to confirm proper registration and good standing, followed by shareholder and director checks to identify decision-makers. KYC and KYB verification confirm identities and legitimacy. Unclear ownership, layered entities, or missing documents often slow approvals. Demonstrating operational transparency, in terms of showing how the business runs, who manages funds, and how disputes are handled, helps underwriters assess risk more accurately and improves chances of smooth approval.
Product & Compliance Review
The following overview helps showcase how business can outline their product and compliance structure in a clear overview:
- Ingredient verification – Confirms all ingredients are disclosed, safe, and allowed for sale in target markets.
- Label accuracy – Ensures labels match actual ingredients, dosages, and legal requirements.
- Marketing claims review – Checks that product claims are realistic, compliant, and not medical promises.
- Prohibited vs. restricted product categories – Identifies ingredients or products that are banned or tightly regulated.
- Manufacturing standards (if applicable) – Reviews whether products are made in compliant, reputable facilities.
Website & Sales Funnel Evaluation
Let’s take a closer look into how websites and sales funnel conduct evaluation for transparency:
- Product page clarity – Ensures descriptions, images, and instructions are easy to understand.
- Refund & return policies – Checks that policies are clear, fair, and easy for customers to find.
- Shipping timelines – Verifies estimated delivery times are realistic and communicated upfront.
- Terms and conditions visibility – Confirms that T&Cs are accessible and cover key legal points.
- Subscription disclosure requirements – Reviews clarity of recurring billing, cancellation, and renewal terms.
- Billing descriptor transparency – Ensures payment statements clearly show the merchant name to reduce disputes.
Chargebacks, Refund Ratios & Historical Processing Data
Underwriters closely review a supplement merchant’s payment history to gauge financial risk. Acceptable chargeback thresholds are industry-dependent, and exceeding them can delay approval or trigger higher reserves. Banks also analyze refund patterns, looking for frequent or recurring refunds that may indicate customer dissatisfaction or unclear policies.
Dispute reason codes are monitored to understand the nature of complaints, whether they relate to product quality, misrepresentation, or fraud. Prior processing history heavily influences risk scoring, as merchants with consistent, low-dispute records are seen as safer. For new businesses without history, risk modeling relies on industry averages, projected volume, and business setup. Clear policies, responsive customer support, and accurate product representation help minimize perceived risk and improve underwriting outcomes.
Payment Volume, Average Ticket & Sales Model Assessment
Underwriters evaluate a merchant’s sales patterns and transaction details to understand overall risk and predict potential disputes. Here is how:
- Projected vs. historical volume – Underwriters compare expected sales to past performance to assess stability.
- Average order value impact – High-ticket transactions may increase perceived risk, while lower-value orders are generally safer.
- Subscription vs. one-time purchase models – Recurring billing can raise risk if cancellation terms or customer communication are unclear.
- Affiliate or influencer-driven traffic risks – Third-party promotions can lead to misleading claims or unexpected chargebacks.
- Traffic source evaluation – Providers assess whether traffic is organic, paid, or potentially high-risk to predict dispute likelihood.
Cross-Border Sales & International Risk Review
Selling supplements internationally increases underwriting complexity. Banks and PSPs review geographic risk exposure, focusing on destination countries and dispute or fraud likelihood. Currency handling and settlement processes are also assessed to ensure reliable cross-border payments. Providers watch fraud patterns by region and consider local regulations, which vary widely in labeling, claims, and ingredient rules. Clear, localized shipping, return, and compliance policies help reduce risk and show underwriters that the merchant can manage international operations responsibly.
Rolling Reserves, Settlement Delays & Approval Conditions
Even after approval, supplement merchants often face conditions like rolling reserves or delayed settlements. Reserves are required to protect banks and PSPs against potential chargebacks or refunds, ensuring funds are available if disputes arise. Typical rolling reserve structures hold a percentage of each transaction for a set period, often 90 to 180 days, before releasing the funds. Providers may also impose volume caps or monitoring periods to observe how the merchant handles growth and risk. Over time, merchants can reduce reserve levels by maintaining low chargeback rates, clear refund policies, and consistent transaction patterns, demonstrating reliability and financial stability to the underwriters.
How Merchants Can Strengthen Their Underwriting Profile
Supplement merchants can improve their chances of smooth approvals by focusing on clarity and consistency. Maintaining clear compliance positioning shows banks and PSPs that products and claims meet legal standards. Using transparent marketing language helps prevent misunderstandings that could lead to disputes. Strong customer service systems ensure issues are addressed quickly, while proactive dispute management minimizes chargebacks and builds trust with payment providers. Finally, demonstrating consistent processing stability, like steady sales, low refund rates, and reliable fulfillment, signals reliability, helping underwriters view the business as lower risk and eligible for better terms over time.
Supplement Merchant Underwriting vs Standard eCommerce Approval
Underwriting for supplement merchants is more thorough than for most standard eCommerce businesses. Compared with low-risk industries like clothing or general retail, supplements carry higher potential for chargebacks, regulatory scrutiny, and customer disputes. This is why supplement reviews take longer, often involving multiple layers of checks on products, marketing, and business structure. Banks and PSPs apply risk-adjusted approval models, tailoring conditions like reserves, settlement delays, or transaction limits based on perceived exposure. Despite the extra steps, this detailed process supports long-term scalability, allowing merchants who meet standards to grow safely with stable payment processing and fewer interruptions.
Underwriting as a Stability Framework
Lastly, underwriting should be seen as a tool for risk control, not a barrier. For supplement businesses, careful supplement merchant underwriting ensures long-term processing security and protects against disputes, chargebacks, and compliance issues. Following structured approval processes allows merchants to operate confidently and sustainably. By embracing underwriting as a stability framework rather than an obstacle, businesses can scale responsibly, build trust with payment providers, and secure reliable payment operations over time.
FAQs
Why do banks closely review supplement merchants?
Because supplements carry higher chargeback and compliance risk than standard products.
Does supplement merchant underwriting always include reserves?
Not always, but reserves are common, especially for new or high-volume merchants.
Can good performance change underwriting terms?
Yes. Consistent low disputes and stable sales often lead to better conditions.
Are subscriptions harder to underwrite for supplements?
Yes, due to recurring billing risk, but clear terms and easy cancellations help.
Is underwriting different for international supplement sellers?
Yes. Cross-border sales increase regulatory and dispute complexity.
Reference
IBS Intelligence: Redefining the relationship between PSPs and merchants
Medium: AI in Risk Management — AI-Driven Enhancements in Merchant Onboarding, and Underwriting
GETTRX: Nutraceutical Payment Processing: What you Need to Know
Pay Atlas: Nutraceuticals & Supplements
Leave a Reply